It is indicative of the atmosphere of this
play that it should begin, simply, with Sean O’Callaghan walking from one side
of the stage to the other. The audience
stop talking, wait for something to happen, and question whether that really
was the beginning. A light shines
from the side of stage, and the play begins.
The ‘house’ lights – the building’s fluorescent
strip lighting – are kept on. We are
voyeurs on a story of cleaners in a meat factory working on zero-hour contracts. We follow three women as they proceed through
a group interview, preliminary training and the following days of work. They meet Phil, a full-time member of staff,
and Ian, their power-hungry supervisor who is driven by ideals similar to
Nietzsche’s Das Übermensch. They sweep, they
mop, they scrub the walls. They take a break, they eat some biscuits. Phil reads a book. Susan plays some music on an old cassette player. They barely speak to each other, and when small
moments of warmth and humanity occur they are shut down before we can feel like
we really know these characters.
It is saddening, because if that’s how we
feel, we can fully understand how the characters must feel about each other. We hear snippets of their back stories – Phil
is divorced, Becky has a child – but never anything in detail. Phil shuts himself in the toilet for fifteen
minutes without any explanation. Susan
steals biscuits from Grace, presumably because she can’t afford to buy
food. Becky storms out of the room declaring
that she is going for a cigarette five minutes before the official break
time. They are each having their own
personal crises, but never talk about them, neither to each other or to us. It all comes to a head when Becky storms back
into the room, faces Phil, and they have sex between the delivery crates. If that’s not a desperate plea for human
compassion, I don’t know what is.
In a sense, the play calls our bluff as the
middle classes sat with our glasses of wine and paper fans. It is, essentially, a portrait of the working-classes
as we recognise it. We have preconceived
ideas about who these people are – living off benefits, council-housed, tracksuit-wearing,
uneducated, single parent – and the play is resistant to deny that. The small moments of humanity bleed through when
the group talk about Phil’s book or sing along to the music, but they are immediately
snatched away and the group are straight back to work.
We are always moments away from finding something we can sympathise
with, something we can care about. But
consider the title of the piece – ‘Beyond Caring’. It is ironic that these people are portrayed
to be beyond our care, and yet this play provokes the exact opposite effect.
In the Dialogue Theatre Club discussion
after the play, we talked about the poignant symmetry of the men working in the
warehouse next door to The Yard, chopping vegetables.
When we left the theatre, we peered into the factory, watched
the men chopping, and carried on walking to the tube.
This play felt a lot like that.
No comments:
Post a Comment